Secure code review
Manual inspection of authentication, authorization, input handling, and secrets across the paths that matter before release.
Chiang Mai · Secure Review Desk
Application hardening advisory grounded in line-by-line code review—not slide decks.
The desk
We read the repositories you ship, map trust boundaries, and return findings you can assign to a sprint—not a generic maturity scorecard.
Manual inspection of authentication, authorization, input handling, and secrets across the paths that matter before release.
Concrete configuration and architecture guidance so residual risk is reduced without freezing delivery.
A written go / hold recommendation with severity-ranked issues and owner-ready remediation notes.
Flagship
Built for product teams preparing a release, a vendor handoff, or a regulated audit window. You share a scoped repository slice; we return annotated findings, severity, and hardening priorities within an agreed window.
From the floor
“They caught a session fixation path we had already marked as ‘later’—the write-up made it impossible to keep postponing.”
“The hardening note on our admin API rate limits was blunt. We disliked the tone for a day, then implemented every item.”
Field notes
A practical way to draw module boundaries so findings stay actionable before a release date.
Session handling mistakes that keep appearing in application hardening advisory sessions across Thailand product teams.
How System Stonepoint structures findings so secure code review items become sprint tickets instead of unread PDFs.
Next step
Tell us the stack, release date, and the two or three concerns keeping you awake. We reply within two business days with a scoped estimate.
Request a scoping call