Evidence

Client stories

Accounts from teams who booked secure code review and hardening advisory with System Stonepoint—specific work, not generic praise.

They spent the first morning arguing with us about which admin routes were actually in scope. Annoying at the time; it meant the report did not waste pages on a marketing microsite. The session fixation write-up alone paid for the engagement.

Arisa K., engineering lead — Secure Code Review

The hardening note on our API rate limits was blunt. We disliked the tone for a day, then implemented every item before the partner audit. I would still prefer softer language next time, but the prioritization was right.

Marcus L., platform manager — Application Hardening Advisory

We booked a release gate three days before cutover. They held the go decision until we rotated a leaked CI secret and closed a debug endpoint that had slipped into the candidate tag. Tight timeline, clear blockers.

Nattapong S., release manager — Pre-Release Security Gate

Findings referenced exact handlers in our NestJS auth module. Our junior developers could reproduce issues without waiting for a security specialist to translate jargon.

Elena V., tech lead — Secure Code Review

Extended story: payments service handoff

A Chiang Mai product company absorbed a contractor-built payments service before an ASEAN partner launch. System Stonepoint scoped a Secure Code Review to webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, and admin refund paths. The findings pack surfaced a replayable webhook route and inconsistent authorization checks on refund overrides. The team deferred two low-severity logging issues and shipped after closing the blockers. A short Hardening Advisory followed to set rate limits and secret rotation ownership.